نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسنده
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
This paper critically re-examines the dialogue between Islamic studies and sociology in contemporary Iran, specifically analyzing the contribution and influence of Dr. Ali Shariati. The research delineates three distinct phases of Islamic studies in Iran: "Revolutionary Islamic Studies," "Religious Intellectualism," and "Academic Islamic Studies." It demonstrates how the continued sociological engagement with earlier forms of Islamic studies (particularly focusing on Shariati), despite its initial constructive role, now acts as a point of rupture and even impasse in this dialogue. Adopting a historical-hermeneutical approach, the article argues that ideological and prescriptive readings of Islam, such as Shariati's class-oriented interpretation, face fundamental methodological and ontological challenges from the perspective of academic Islamic studies. Finally, to overcome this stalemate, the author proposes that sociology adopt a middle ground: a path that leverages the "empirical rationality" of religious intellectualism while remaining faithful to the "hermeneutical historicity" of academic Islamic studies. This trajectory, it is hoped, will lead to a deeper, non-ideological, and historically-informed understanding of Islam, enabling sociology to effectively address contemporary social issues.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)