Abstract
Corona, which was a deadly pandemic from a biological point of view, seems to have caused people to act more intelligently in their interactions with the requirement of social distancing from a sociological point of view. Intelligence, which has been the focus of many biological and psychological discussions, at the same time has remained far from the perspective of sociological analysis. Based on this, the current research is focused on the analysis of the role of intelligence in the interaction with the phenomenology of the lived experience of Borujerd Lak-speakers of pre/post-corona social interactions. 16 samples were selected purposefully and the data were collected through in-depth interviews and participatory observation. According to the results, "mass interaction" (pre-corona) was based on mass behavior, autocratic construction, and mass intelligence, and "social interaction" (post-corona) was based on social behavior, democratic construction, and social intelligence. . The findings of the present research showed that intelligence is a social component and has social functions and results that can be analyzed sociologically. In general, facing Corona has caused a transition from mass interaction to social interaction, and intelligence as a social category has played an important role in this transition.
Keywords: Corona, Post-Corona, Social Interaction, Mass Intelligence, Social Intelligence.
 
Introduction
In its history, Iran has had experiences in the field of outbreaks of epidemic diseases such as cholera and plague, which have led to cultural and social changes. Corona was also an epidemic disease whose frightening speed of spread disrupted social interactions first of all. At the beginning of facing Corona, some domestic researchers warned that the continuation of this process will cause irreparable damage to social solidarity, especially in "ethnic contexts" because such contexts have intertwined interactions. Although the corona has been contained today, it seems that there have been changes in ethnic interactions. A part of the population of the Lak tribe that lives in Borujerd city, although it had previously experienced some cultural changes due to exposure to Borujerdi culture, and more importantly with modernity, ethnic interactions are still important for members of the tribe. There was a lot that it seems that in the face of Corona, these interactions have undergone changes and indicate that people are acting more intelligently. Corona, which was a deadly pandemic from a biological point of view, seems to have caused people to intelligently review their interactions with the requirement of social distancing from a sociological point of view. Intelligence, which has been the focus of many biological and psychological discussions, at the same time has remained far from the perspective of sociological analysis. Now we are faced with questions from a sociological point of view: What changes has the corona threat brought about in interactions? What was the role of intelligence in pre/post corona interaction? And more importantly, is intelligence a social component?
Materials & Methods
In the current research, the phenomenological method with the Moustakas technique is used, which is based on the phenomenological philosophy of Edmund Husserl. The society studied in the current research included Lak-speakers of Borujerd city. The sampling method was purposeful, which means that the researcher deliberately went to those who had the lived experience of the phenomenon under study. Due to the fact that facing the danger of Corona has been a universal phenomenon, as a result, all the members of the tribe had enough life experience, but in order to obtain richer information, samples from among People over 20 years old have been selected. The process of sampling and data collection continued until theoretical saturation; That is, until no more new data was obtained, and finally 16 samples were studied. The method of data collection was in-depth interview and participatory observation. An in-depth interview means that the participant was free to provide answers and the researcher only directed the discussion to the topic under study and there were no predetermined answers. In order to interview each participant, three separate steps were taken: 1) field of lived experience, 2) lived experience, and 3) meaning of lived experience. Due to the fact that the researcher is a native speaker, the interviews were collected in the native language and translated into colloquial Farsi with faithfulness in the translation. The resulting data were analyzed using the Moustakas technique.
Discussion & Result
The findings from qualitative data coding include two conceptual constructs. The general structure of "mass interaction" (Pishacrona) is based on two main clusters of mass behavior and autocratic construction, which includes 6 sub-clusters: 1) blindly (imitating the majority), 2) spontaneous group The axis is 3) mass intelligence, 4) irrational intelligence, 5) mass-oriented (individual/mass), and 6) collective action. On the other hand, the general structure of "social interaction" (post-corona) is based on two main clusters of social behavior and democratic construction, which includes 9 sub-clusters: 1) Rethinking (imitation of a reasonable model), 2) Conscious Individuality-centered, 3) social intelligence, 4) reasonable intelligence, 5) systematic emotions, 6) antisocial resocialization, 7) selective reproduction, 8) community-centered (I-we), and 9) social action.
Conclusion
The spread of Corona made keeping distance a part of life so that a more effective individual and social confrontation with it can take place. This social distancing brought about changes in social interactions, especially in ethnic contexts. Mass intelligence, which is the basis of interaction in pre-corona interaction, is a minimal level of intelligence that receives only behavioral signs from the external environment or epistemic data from folk knowledge and is the basis of action. to give In fact, the action resulting from using mass intelligence is a mass action, a pure imitation of the majority, of the mass. While social intelligence, which is the basis of interaction in the post-corona interaction and is similar to what Durkheim called the rational dimension of intelligence, with the difference that it receives both sensory signs and rational-logical reasoning is linked to it. Life is a higher level of intelligence. The action (action) resulting from using social intelligence is a social action in the real sense, because as a result of it, a person adopts those types of interactions and interactive actions that at the same time show his individuality and value. It brought him collective benefits. Therefore, depending on which type of intelligence the actor uses, his type of action will be different.