نگاهی جامعه‌شناختی به مفهوم تنظیم گری محیط‌زیست در پرتو اصول 8 و 50 قانون اساسی ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار و عضو هیأت علمی گروه حقوق عمومی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران، پردیش کیش، کیش، ایران

چکیده

ازآنجاکه محیط‌زیست سازنده بستر و شالوده زیستی انسان و سایر موجودات زنده است، از اهمیت بنیادین و انکارناپذیر‌ی برخوردار است؛ اما علی‌رغم این جایگاه، توسعه صنعتی و فناورانه ی جهانی، به‌ویژه در دو قرن اخیر، سبب‌ساز تغییرات ناخواسته و اغلب ناخوشایند و تخریب محیط‌زیست در بسیاری از مناطق جهان شده است. ازاین‌رو بسیاری از دولت‌ها ناچار از تنظیم گری مستقیم و غیرمستقیم در حوزه حفاظت و بهبود محیط‌زیست هستند. در ایران نیز دولت با به‌کارگیری تنظیم گری حقوقی، تلاش دارد تا دشواره‌ها و چالش‌های محیط‌زیستی را حل کند و دستکم از پیشروی تخریب و فرسایش آن به مثابه یک پروبلماتیک اجتماعی جلوگیری کند؛ چنانکه اصل 50 قانون اساسی ایران نیز بر تنظیم گری محیط‌زیست تأکید دارد. مقاله پیش رو با بهره‌گیری از روش توصیفی و تحلیلی و با نگاهی جامعه شناختی، به بررسی نحوه تنظیم گری محیط‌زیست در پرتو اصل 8 و 50 قانون اساسی می‌پردازد. یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر نشان می‌دهد که با بهره‌گیری از ظرفیت‌های قانون موجود، باید رویکردی ترکیبی اتخاذ شود که از فواید و کارآمدی دیگر شیوه‌های تنظیم گری برای جبران نقصان‌ها و پر کردن خلأهای تک رویکردی بهره بگیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Sociological View to the Concept of Environmental Regulation in the Light of Principles 8 and 50 of the Constitution of Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Gholamreza Bayat Shahparast 1
  • Nader Mirzadehkohshahi 2
1 Assossiate Professor, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran.
2 PhD student of Public Law, Tehran University, Kish Campus, Kish. Iran
چکیده [English]

Since the environment is the biological foundation of humans and other living beings, it is of fundamental and undeniable importance; But despite this position, global industrial and technological development, especially in the last two centuries, has caused unwanted and often unpleasant changes and environmental destruction in many parts of the world. Therefore, many governments are forced to regulate directly and indirectly in the field of environmental protection and improvement. In Iran, by applying legal regulations, the government is trying to solve environmental problems and challenges and at least prevent its destruction and erosion as a social problem; As Article 50 of the Iranian Constitution also emphasizes on environmental regulation. Using the descriptive and analytical method and with a sociological point of view, the following article examines the way of environmental regulation in the light of Article 8 and 50 of the Constitution. The findings of the current research show that by taking advantage of the capacities of the existing law, a combined approach should be adopted that takes advantage of the benefits and efficiency of other regulatory methods to compensate for the shortcomings and fill the gaps of a single approach.
Keyword: Sociology, Regulation, Environment, Principle8, Principle 50
Introduction
In its current state, the environment is facing serious threats such as climate change, weather pollution, species extinction, biodiversity loss, and irresponsible exploitation of irreversible natural resources. The consequences of these threats will not only affect the lives of humans and other living beings today, but will continue for generations to come, and the consequences of any decision to deal with it will be felt for a long time; Therefore, as a result of the unbreakable and tight connection of the environment with a set of factors and conditions on which the life and durability of living beings depend, there is an urgent need for a precise definition of environmental rights and a set of rules and regulations that regulate the relationship between humans and the environment. and monitor it. Such rules help preserve the environment and natural resources, prevent their further damage and destruction, and maintain the balance between humans and the environment.
Materials & Methods
Using the descriptive and analytical method and with a sociological point of view, the following article examines the way of environmental regulation in the light of Article 8 and 50 of the Constitution.
Discussion
Although there are various definitions of regulation, these definitions can be categorized into three levels: centralized, middle, and decentralized. At the first level, the conventional definition of regulation is as a tool for "command and control" implemented by bureaucratic institutions. At the second or middle level, regulation consists of standards, rules, and after that, monitoring and feedback mechanisms and finally the implementation of these rules. At the third level, there is a decentralized regulatory approach or a community-oriented approach; According to this approach, regulation refers to the process of creating and implementing rules and behavioral standards that promote the welfare and safety of society as a whole. In general, regulation can be defined as follows; Regulation means the application of rules and regulations based on certain criteria and its purpose is to influence and regulate behavior, the flow of affairs or events. This activity can be done by the public and private sectors with the participation of stakeholders in the economic and social fields in order to provide benefits, good and public welfare. The purpose of this activity is to ensure optimal production, distribution of goods and services, and social support. The implementation of regulation and its supervision is the responsibility of the regulator or interested participants. There are several approaches to legal regulation in the field of environment and different countries may adopt different approaches based on their legal traditions, political and social values and economic conditions. In general, the main regulatory approaches in the field of environment can be considered as command and control-based regulatory approach, market-oriented regulation, voluntary regulation and cooperative regulation.
Result
In the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, in addition to Article 50, Article 8 can also be considered. The eighth principle of the constitution considers calling for good, enjoining what is good and forbidding what is bad to be everyone's duty, and it is the responsibility of the people and the government to do it. If we consider environmental protection as an example of good and well-known, we will notice the issuance of implicit permission of the constitution in the use of a hybrid approach of regulation in the field of environment. Article 4 of the Executive Regulations on the Establishment and Activities of Non-Governmental Organizations and Note 2 of Article 16 of the Law on Amendments to the Law on Organizations and Procedures of the Court of Administrative Justice has created the capacity for environmental protection organizations to investigate feedback on the activities of government agencies in this area, obtain information and even file a lawsuit. do These organizations have the right to comment and provide solutions in this regard while examining the existing defects and problems. Government agencies are also allowed to provide non-classified information to non-governmental organizations. The totality of this legal capacity regarding the involvement of non-governmental organizations in the environment and the ineffectiveness of the laws approved as the basis of the principles of the constitution makes it clearer the need to use other approaches and even the use of a multiple approach in the sense of using all regulatory methods in protecting the environment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sociology
  • Regulation
  • Environment
  • Principle8
  • Principle 50
کتابنامه:
رمضانی قوام آبادی، محمدحسین (1392). «حفاظت از محیط زیست در حقوق اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران»، دیدگاه های حقوق قضایی، -(63)، 93-140
شمس آبادی، محمد؛ نصیری، علی؛ صفی، سعید(1398). مقایسۀ تطبیقی حق محیط زیست سالم در سیرۀ نبوی و علوی با حقوق اساسی در جمهوری اسلامی ایران. تاریخ و فرهنگ،  سال دوم، شماره 51
شهدادنژاد، نعیمه؛ جعفری، افشین، جلالیان، عسکر (1399). «مسئولیت دولت ساحلی در آلودگی زیست محیطی با تاکید بر اصل مشارکت در کنوانسیون حقوق دریاها»، پژوهش ملل، شماره 61، 67-90
شیلتون، دینا؛ وریمانتری، کریستوفر؛ کیس، الکساندر (1394). کتابچه قضایی حقـوق محـیط زیسـت، تحقیـق و ترجمـه محسن عبدالهی، تهران: انتشارات خرسندی.
عبدالهی، محسن ؛ ساجدی، زهرا؛  فریادی، مسعود؛  رمضانی‌قوام‌آبادی، محمدحسین(1390).  حقوق کیفری محیط زیست: ملاحظات و راهکارها، تهران: شرکت سهامی روزنامه رسمی کشور.
قوام، میرعظیم (1392). حمایت کیفری از محیط‌زیست، تهران: انتشارات سازمان حفاظت محیط‌زیست.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (1382).« گذری بر تدوین پیش‌نویس قانون اساسی»، نشریه حقوق اساسی، سال اول، شماره 1. 115-137
کاتوزیان، ناصر؛ انصاری، مهدی (1387). «مسئولیت ناشی از خسارت های زیست محیطی»، مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، سال دوم ، دوره 38، شماره 2، 285-313
مرکز بررسی‌های استراتژیک ریاست جمهوری (1400). «درآمدی بر دولت تنظیم گر»، تهران: مرکز بررسی های استراتژیک ریاست جمهوری.
موسسه فرهنگی فقه الثقلین(1395). امر به معروف و نهی از منکر: برگرفته از نظریات فقهی مرجع عالیقدر حضرت آیه‌الله العظمی صانعی مدظله العالی، قم: فقه الثقلین
وطن دوست، صابر؛ جواهری بابلی، مهران (1383). بررسی جرائم زیست محیطی در ایران، اهواز: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
هداوند، مهدی؛ فرهاد، جم(1400).  «مفهوم دولت تنظیم گر: تحلیل تنظیم گری به مثابه ابزار حکمرانی»، نشریه راهبرد، سال 22، دوره30 ، شماره 99، صفحات :227-266.
 
قوانین
قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران 1368
آیین نامه اجرایی تاسیس و فعالیت سازمان های غیردولتی  1384
قانون برنامه اول توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی جمهوری اسلامی ایران (مصوب 11/11/1368)
قانون برنامه دوم توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی جمهوری اسلامی ایران (مصوب 20/09/1373)
قانون برنامه سوم توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی جمهوری اسلامی ایران (مصوب 11/06/1383)
قانون حفاظت بهسازی محیط‌زیست مصوب 28/03/1353
قانون شکار و صید، مصوب 1346
قانون مجازات اسلامی مصوب 1375
قانون مدنی ایران 1307
سند چشم‌انداز جمهوری اسلامی ایران در افق ۱۴۰۴
سیاست های کلی نظام (ابلاغی از سوی مقام معظم رهبری)
 
Berck, P. (2018). The Theory and Practice of Command and Control in Environmental Policy. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
Carol J. Pierce Colfer, Ravi Prabhu(2023). Responding to Environmental Issues through Adaptive Collaborative Management: From Forest Communities to Global Actors. Routledge/Earthscan.
Coglianese, Cary and Nash, Jennifer, (2016). "Motivating Without Mandates: The Role of Voluntary Programs in Environmental Governance". Faculty Scholarship at Penn Carey Law. 1647.
Driesen, David M.)2018) “EMISSIONS TRADING VERSUS POLLUTION TAXES: PLAYING ‘NICE’ WITH OTHER INSTRUMENTS.” Environmental Law, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 29–80.
Foreman, jo, (2018). Developments in environmental regulation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gieseke, Timothy. (2019). Collaborative Environmental Governance Frameworks: A Practical Guide. CRC Press
Greenwood, Steven; Singer, Laurel; Willis, Wendy(2021). Collaborative Governance: Principles, Processes, and Practical Tools. Routledge.
Guo, Xu & Fu, Lin & Sun, Xiaohua. (2021). Can Environmental Regulations Promote Greenhouse Gas Abatement in OECD Countries? Command-and-Control vs. Market-Based Policies. Sustainability. 13. 6913.
Hartlapp, Miriam. (2020). Measuring and Comparing the Regulatory Welfare State: Social Objectives in Public Procurement. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 691.
Heyvaert, Veerle. (2018). Transnational Environmental Regulation and Governance: Purpose, Strategies and Principles. Cambridge University Press
Levi-Faur, David. (2011). The Odyssey of the Regulatory State: Episode One: The Rescue of the Welfare State. Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, 1(39), 1-35.
Levi-Faur, David(2014). The welfare state: a regulatory perspective. Public Administration 92 (3): 599–
Prosser, Tony(2010). The Regulatory Enterprise: Government, Regulation, and Legitimacy. OUP Oxford
Schmitz, B. (2022). Rethinking the Public Interest in Consumer Protection, European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, 9(2), 210-235.
Singhal, Puja )2018(. ."Environmental Regulations: Lessons from the Command-and-Control Approach," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 124, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
Windholz, Eric, & Hodge, Graeme A. (2012). Conceptualising Social and Economic Regulation: Implications for Modern Regulators and Regulatory Activity. Monash University Law Review, 38(49), 212-237