نقش سوژه انقلابی شریعتی در بسیج سیاسی مردم و تاثیر آن بر انقلاب اسلامی

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسنده

دکتری تخصصی علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

10.30465/scs.2023.9128

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی رویکرد سوبژکتیو علی شریعتی به مفهوم انسان و مسئولیت اجتماعی وی و تاثیر آن در خوانش انقلابی از مذهب به عنوان یک ایدئولوژی سیاسی رادیکال است. شریعتی با بکارگیری این رویکرد یک سوژه انقلابی را در ادبیات مذهبی تشیع صورتبندی کرد. سوال اصلی پژوهش حاضر این است که سوژه انقلابی چه جایگاهی در اندیشه شریعتی داشت؟ و تحلیل انقلابی شریعتی از مذهب تشیع تا چه اندازه در بسیج سیاسی توده‌های مردم در انقلاب اسلامی موثر بود؟ این پژوهش با استفاده از روش تحلیلی- تاریخی می‌خواهد ضمن تحلیل شاخصه‌های اصلی پروژه فکری شریعتی به ارزیابی نقش آن در پیروزی انقلاب اسلامی آن بپردازد. توجه به پیامد‌های سیاسی و اجتماعی رویکرد سوبژکتیو شریعتی، شامل توجه به سوژه انقلابی و بازتعریف آن در ادبیات مذهبی تشیع و نقش آن در ترسیم سیمای انقلابی مذهب به عنوان عامل تحول اجتماعی و تاریخی و سهم آن در شکل‌گیری و تکوین انقلاب اسلامی از مهم‌ترین یافته‌های این پژوهش است. نتیجه کلی این پژوهش نشان‌گر آن است که شریعتی با به کارگیری رویکرد سوبژکتیو، ایدئولوژیک و انقلابی به دین آن را به عنصراصلی بسیج سیاسی تاقشار مختلف در انقلاب اسلامی تبدیل کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The role of Shariati's revolutionary subject in the political mobilization of the people and its impact on the Islamic revolution

نویسنده [English]

  • Mohammad Nejadiran
PhD of Political Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Department of Research Sciences،TehranTIran.
چکیده [English]

The purpose of the current research is to investigate Ali Shariati's subjective approach to the concept of man and his social responsibility and its impact on the revolutionary reading of religion as a radical political ideology. By using this approach, Shariati formulated a revolutionary subject in Shiite religious literature. The main question of the current research is, what place did the revolutionary subject have in Shariati's thought? And to what extent Shariati's revolutionary analysis of Shiism was effective in the political mobilization of the masses of people in the Islamic Revolution? This research, using the analytical-historical method, wants to analyze the main features of Shariati's intellectual project and evaluate its role in the victory of the Islamic Revolution.Paying attention to the political and social consequences of Shariati's subjective approach, including paying attention to the revolutionary subject and its redefinition in Shia religious literature and its role in drawing the revolutionary image of religion as a factor of social and historical transformation and its contribution to the formation and development of the Islamic Revolution are among the most important findings of this It is research.
 
key words:Revolutionary subject, political mobilization, Ali Shariati, religion, Islamic revolution
 
Introduction:
The aim of the present study is to investigate the mental approach of Ali Shariati as one of the important figures of contemporary Iranian intellectuals to the concept of man and his social responsibility and its effect on the revolutionary reading of religion as a radical political ideology. The main question of this research is that what role did Shariati's mental, radical and revolutionary approach in reading religious concepts play in the ideological formulation of his thought and what political impact did he have on the victory of the Islamic Revolution? The main hypothesis is based on the fact that Shariati, by redefining religious concepts on the axis of revolutionary subject and social praxis in the framework of a radical political ideology, was able to present a revolutionary narrative of political Islam, which plays an important role in the political mobilization of different sections of society, especially the educated youth in the revolution. had islamicWhat is important for us in this research is not a judgment about the merits and demerits of Shariati's intellectual project or a judgment about the relationship between religion and ideology. Rather, we seek to understand the nature of Shariati's thought as a religious revolutionary intellectual and its relationship with the modern subject, so that we can better understand the logic of his thinking and his method of understanding and interpreting history and religious texts.
Materials & Methods:
 The method of collecting the necessary data to conduct such a research was documents, in the framework of which a collection of Shariati's views related to the revolutionary subject and his radical interpretation of religion was collected. These views have been presented directly or indirectly in the form of his lectures, books and works. Criticism and analysis of the collected data has been done using the analytical-historical method, which wants to analyze the main features of Shariati's intellectual project and evaluate its role in the victory of the Islamic Revolution.
Discussion:
One of the most important findings of this research is that Shariati, inspired by modern humanism, had a volitional and subjective view of man, and based on the role of the subject and the role of the subject, he assigned a special place in social developments. And it pays special attention to the historical agency of man as the agent of historical and social changes and to the dialectic of the individual and the society. Shariati's intellectual project is to present an image of a revolutionary subject who can transform and change the world around him. This is the characteristic that has made Shariati a modern and radical humanist thinker.Shariati tried to strengthen and revive the revolutionary potential of religion by discussing "Islamic Protestantism". In his opinion, religion should move towards worldly issues from an eschatological point of view. Shariati gave the main role to responsible and revolutionary intellectuals in the path of reviving the revolutionary and radical image of religion. He believed that these intellectuals should create Islamic Protestantism instead of fighting religion as a reactionary element in order to give a new thought and movement to the society. The most important feature of Shariati's intellectual work was the use of new ideological and sociological formats in redefining religious concepts.Shariati's intellectual influence among the educated youth and pushing them towards religion as an ideology in the Islamic revolution should be considered as a kind of intellectual creativity in redefining the revolutionary issue around the element of religion as one of the foundations of identity and belief of the Iranian society of that era. Many analysts who have investigated and studied the Islamic Revolution of Iran believe that Shariati's thoughts played an important role in the Islamic Revolution of Iran. Redefining religious concepts around subjectivity and revolution in Shariati's thought is considered the most important strength of his intellectual project, which shows the modern and revolutionary political capability of Shariati's thought. With this pattern in reading religious texts, history and teachings, he succeeded in presenting a radical and revolutionary image of religion and considered religion as the main factor of seeking justice and political protest.Shariati's subjective approach to religion is a completely modern phenomenon that aims to define a revolutionary political and social role for Shi'ism in Iran at that time. Considering the level of widespread influence of religion among different strata of the traditional and transitioning Iranian society, Shariati knew that the dominance of a radical and revolutionary narrative of religion can be the foundation of a comprehensive and revolutionary political action.
Result:
The general result of this research shows that Shariati, as a revolutionary religious intellectual, by presenting his coherent, methodical, history-oriented and creative narrative of the texts and history of Islam, was able to draw a different picture from the traditional narrative of the clergy about religion, which has new political capacities for it as It provides the impetus for political action in an ideological formulation. Shariati's revolutionary approach to religion became the basis for presenting a radical and protesting image of religion, which played an important role in stimulating religious youth towards political action. Shariati's ideological reading of religion was carried out with the aim of pushing the Iranian society towards a political revolution against the autocratic and dependent Pahlavi regime. By applying a subjective, ideological and revolutionary approach to religion, Shariati has turned it into the main element of the political mobilization of various social forces in the Islamic Revolution.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Revolutionary subject
  • political mobilization
  • Ali Shariati
  • religion
  • Islamic revolution
- بهشتی، سیدمحمد (1390) دکتر شریعتی جستجوگری در مسیر شدن، تهران: روزنه.
- دکارت، رنه (1384) تأملات در فلسفه اولی، ترجمه احمد احمدی، تهران: سمت.
- رهنما، علی(1383)، مسلمانی در جستجوی ناکجاآباد، ترجمه کیومرث قرقلو، تهران: گام نو.
- سروش‌، عبدالکریم‌ (1372) فربه‌تر از ایدئولوژی‌، تهران‌: صراط.
- سروش‌، عبدالکریم‌ (1378)  بسط‌ تجربه‌ نبوی‌، تهران‌: صراط‌.
- شریعتی، علی(1357) تشیع علوی و تشیع صفوی، مجموعه آثار 9، تهران: چاپخش.
- شریعتی، علی (۱۳۵۸) شیعه، مجموعه‌ آثار7، تهران: سحاب.
- شریعتی، علی (۱۳۶۰) مذهب علیه مذهب، مجموعه آثار ۲۲ ، تهران: سبز.
- شریعتی، علی  (1361الف) جهان‌بینی‌ و ایدئولوژی‌، مجموعه‌ آثار 23، تهران‌: شرکت‌ سهامی‌ انتشار.
- شریعتی، علی  (1361ب) انسان بی‌خود ، مجموعه آثار 25،تهران: قلم.
- شریعتی، علی (۱۳۶۱ج) خودسازی‌ انقلابی‌، مجموعه‌ آثار 2، تهران‌: الهام‌.
- شریعتی، علی (۱۳۶۱د)تاریخ تمدن1،مجموعه آثار 11، تهران: آگاه.
- شریعتی، علی (1362) انسان، مجموعه آثار 24، تهران: الهام.
- شریعتی، علی (1370) چه باید کرد، مجموعه آثار 20، تهران: قلم.
- شریعتی، علی  (۱۳۷۱) بازشناسی هویت ایرانی-اسلامی، مجموعه آثار ۲۷، تهران: الهام.
- شریعتی، علی (1375) اسلام‌شناسی1، مجموعه آثار ۱۶، تهران: قلم.
- شریعتی، علی (1377). جهت‌گیری طبقاتی در اسلام. مجموعه آثار 10، تهران: قلم.                                     
- شریعتی، علی (1379الف) روش شناخت اسلام، مجموعه آثار28،  تهران: چاپخش.
- شریعتی، علی (۱۳۷۹ب) اسلام‌شناسی2، مجموعه‌ی آثار17، تهران: قلم.
- شریعتی، علی  (1380) حسین وارث آدم، مجموعه‌ آثار19، تهران: قلم.
- شریعتی، علی (1384) ما و اقبال ، مجموعه آثار شماره5، تهران:الهام.
- شریعتی، علی (1389) بازگشت، مجموعه آثار4، تهران: الهام.
- شریعتی، علی (1391) میعاد با ابراهیم، مجموعه آثار29، تهران: دیدار.
- عبدالکریمی، بیژن (1370) نگاهی دوباره به معانی فلسفه  سیاسی شریعتی، تهران: ناشر مؤلف.
- عبدالکریمی، بیژن (1373) شریعتی و سیاست‌زدگی، تهران: رسا.
- عبدالکریمی، بیژن (1393) شریعتی و تفکر آینده ما، تهران: نقد فرهنگ.
 
- علایی ، محمدحسن و وثوقی، منصور(1397)«تحلیل اندیشه های شریعتی در ارتباط با تفکر غیر تئولوژیک-غیر سکولار»، فصلنامه جامعه‌پژوهی فرهنگی، دوره 9، شماره 3. 73-93.
- علیجانی، رضا (1382) شریعتی‌شناسی: اصلاح انقلابی، تهران: یادآوران.
- علیجانی، رضا (1380) رند خام: شریعتی‌شناسی: زمانه، زندگی و آرمان‌های شریعتی، تهران‌: نشر شادگان‌.
- قانعی‌راد، محمدامین(1397) تبارشناسی عقلانیت مدرن: قرائتی پست‌مدرن از اندیشه شریعتی، تهران‌: نقد فرهنگ‌.
- طباطبایی، سیدجواد(1392) مکتب تبریز و مقدمات تجددخواهی، تهران: مینوی‌خرد.
-‌ کانت، ایمانوئل(1369) بنیاد مابعدالطبیعه اخلاق، ترجمه حمید عنایت و علی قیصری، تهران: خوارزمی.
-‌ کانت، ایمانوئل (1376) روشنگری چیست؟، ترجمه سیروس آرین‌پور، تهران: آگه.
-‌ کانت، ایمانوئل (1381) دین در محدوده عقل تنها، ترجمه منوچهر صانعی دره‌بیدی، تهران: نقش و نگار.
- مارکس،کارل (1386) هجدهم برومر لوئی بناپارت، ترجمه از محمد پورهرمزان، آبادان: پرسش.
- مارکس،کارل (1375) گروندریسه: مبانی نقد اقتصاد سیاسی،ترجمه باقر پرهام و احمد تدین، تهران: آگه.
- مارکس،کارل (1378) سرمایه (جلد اول)، ترجمه ایرج اسکندری،تهران: فردوس.
- محدثی، حسن (۱۳۸۳) زیر سقف اعتقاد: بنیان‌های ماقبل انتقادی اندیشه شریعتی، تهران: فرهنگ و اندیشه.
- میرسپاسی، علی(1384) تاملی درباره مدرنیته ایرانی، ترجمه جلال توکلیان، تهران: طرح نو.
- میری، سیدجواد (1395) شریعتی و هایدگر، تهران: نقد فرهنگ.
- میری، سیدجواد (1396) آزادی و تاریخ: تاملی بر نگاه انسان‌شناسانه شریعتی، تهران: نقد فرهنگ.
- میری، سیدجواد (1398)«علوم اجتماعی و مسئله مفروضات پشت صحنه»، فصلنامه جامعه‌پژوهی فرهنگی، دوره 10، شماره 4. 119-133.
- میری، سیدجواد (1401) اتودی نظری از تخیل جامعه‌شناسی شریعتی، تهران: نقد فرهنگ.
- نژادایران، محمد (1394) روشنفکری دینی و مدرنیته در ایران، تهران: گوهرشید.
 
- Boudon , Raymond  & François Bourricaud(2003)A Critical Dictionary of Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Callinicos, Alex (1995) The Revolutionary Ideas of Karl Marx, London: Bookmarks.
- Chatterjee, Kingshuk (2011) Ali Shari’ati and the Shaping of Political Islam in Iran, Palgrave Macmillan US.
-Cottingham, J.; R. Stoothof and D. Murdoch. (CSM). (1991) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes ,Cambridge  University Press.
- Dabashi,Hamid (2008) Islamic Liberation Theology: Resisting the Empire, published by Routledge.
- Hegel, G. W. F. (1977) Phenomenology of Sprit, Trans. A. V. Miller, Oxford: Clarendon.
- Hegel, G. W. F (1999) Lectures on the History of Philosophy. trans: Haldane and Simson. Cambridge    University Press.
- Hegel, G. W. F (2010) The Science of Logic, Edited and Trans. by George di Giovanni,Cambidge: Cambidge University Press.
- Honderich, Ted (1995) The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hunter, Shireen (2008) Reformist Voices of Islam: Mediating Islam and Modernity, NewYork: M. E. Sharpe.
- Kant, Immanuel (2002) Critiqe of Practical reason; Trans by Werner S. Pluhar, Introduction by Stephen Engstrom, Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Lebowitz, Michael (2003), Beyond Capital: Marx’s Political Economy of the Working Class, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
- Liddel, Brendan.E.A(1970) Kant on the Foundation of Morality, (A Modern Version of the Grandlegung), Bloomington and London, Indian University Press
- Marx, Karl (1974) The Communist Manifesto in The Revolution of 1948, edited by David Fernbach, New york: Random House.
 
- Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels (1956) The Holy Family, Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
- Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich (1970) The German Ideology: Part 1, trans. and ed. Chris Arthur, New York: International Publishers.
- Marx, Karl (1964) Early Writings, trans. and ed. Tom Bottomore, New York: McGraw-Hill.
-Matin, Kamran (2010)"Decoding Political Islam: Uneven and Combined Development and Ali Shariati's Political Thought, " in International Relations and non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism, and Investigations of Global Modernity, ed. Robbie Shilliam ,London: Routledg.
- Matin-Asgari, Afshin (2017) Both Eastern and Western: An Intellectual History of Iranian Modernity, Cambridge University Press.
- Michie, Jonathan (2014) Reader's Guide to the Social Sciences, London: Routledge.
- Mirsepassi, Ali(2017) Transnationalism in Iranian Political Thought: The Life and Times of Ahmad Fardid, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Mirsepassi, Ali (2019) Iran's Quiet Revolution, Cambridge University Press.
- Nasr, Vali (2007), The Shia Revival, Norton, New York Times Bestseller.
- Safari, Siavash (2017) Beyond Shariati: Modernity, Cosmopolitanism, and Islam in Iranian Political Thought, Cambridge :Cambridge University Press.
 
-William Baker, Raymond(2022) “Ali Shariati: The Believing Revolutionary”, Justice in Islam: The Quest for the Righteous Community From Abu Dharr to Muhammad Ali, Oxford:Oxford University Press.
- Wodak, Ruth(1989) Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse, Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publication.